Just providing a bit of clarification on this. If you leave off the
subfield 9, the record will only appear in search results if you are
using a transcendent record source.
What I was describing before was a case where you would solely be using
Located URI's without the transcendent bib source. If you don't use
transcendent record sources, then you can make the records appear
consortium-wide by adding the consortium to the subfield 9.
Many consortia using Located URI's don't use transcendent record sources
because they appear in too many places, including searches limited to
copy locations.
The documentation at
http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.9/_cataloging_electronic_resources_8201_8212_8201_finding_them_in_catalog_searches.html
describes the difference between the two methods of exposing electronic
resources.
Kathy
On 10/06/2015 10:38 AM, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
Donald,
You can also leave off the |9 if you want all the consortium to
retrieve the record in a search. To see how we did a record for a
resource available to the entire consortium, check
http://gapines.org/eg/opac/record/5737867?query=mango%20languages;qtype=keyword;locg=9
and then scroll down to view the MARC record.
If you just want to give the two libraries access to the same URL, I
would suggest adding the |9 for each location to one 856 rather than
multiple 856s. I personally would only use 2 856s if the link
differed for the 2 libraries.
/Elaine/
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235.7128
404.235.7201, fax
[email protected]
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines
*From:*Open-ils-general
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
Of *Kathy Lussier
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:03 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] E-Books and item records ... again
Hi Don,
It depends.
From your question, I'm assuming you are using Located URIs since the
WATS library can't see your electronic resources.
There is a global flag you can enable to see these electronic
resources when scoped to the consortium (ASLAN), but they won't show
up for users specifically searching the WATS library.
You could add a second subfield 9 with the WATS library to your 856
field. This would continue to display just one URL on the record, but
force it to appear in the WATS library scope. Alternatively, you could
add a second 856 field for the WATS library if you want two URL's to
display: one that should be used for ATS and one that should be used
for WATS.
If you want the resource to appear for all branches, you could put the
consortium in subfield 9 instead of ATS.
Kathy
On 10/06/2015 09:50 AM, Donald Butterworth wrote:
Hi Folks,
This question harkins back to the discussion we had some months
ago about best practices for ebook; should there be an item record
associated with an e-title? There seemed to be a consensus that an
item record isn't necessary.
Here is our new scenario. We have a bib record that is already
available in the ATS Library. The WATS Library (which is part of
our consortium) wants it to appear in their catalog as well. How
is that done if there is no attached item record?
Hoping this is just a newbie question.
Thanks!
Don
--
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
(859) 858-2227
--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
--
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
[email protected]
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
