> > I agree that having just one mailing list is the most convenient for > > kernel developers. But not everyone who is subscribed to open-iscsi is > > a kernel developer. Wouldn't it be more convenient for iSCSI users to > > have two lists -- one intended for iSCSI users, and one for iSCSI > > developers, such that the users can subscribe to the former only ? > > Just my two cents. > > > > Bart. > > > > >From my experience this makes users loos on the Kernel guys. > Kernel guys are busy, and mind their own business, but > if a question comes up, which they know the answer they would > occasionally participate. Splitting will loos that.
I think Bart is talking about two camps of users: developers (both kernel and user-land), and those seeking help. > > I think iscsi mailing-list is not that big and still easy > to monitor. Just set your mailer to view by thread, and > it's easy to jump over threads that are not interesting. I have to agree, Ctrl-D in mutt is wonderfull thing. > > My $0.017 > Boaz > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
