snip ips list. Julian Satran wrote: > some answers in text > > ips-boun...@ietf.org wrote on 11/08/2009 23:56:10: > >> From: >> >> Mike Christie <mchri...@redhat.com> >> >> To: >> >> i...@ietf.org, Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de>, open-iscsi <open- >> is...@googlegroups.com> >> >> Date: >> >> 11/08/2009 23:57 >> >> Subject: >> >> [Ips] lun reset and r2t error handling >> >> Sent by: >> >> ips-boun...@ietf.org >> >> Hi, >> >> For a single connection session with ERL=0 and without FastAbort, if the > >> initiator has sent a lun reset task management function and the target >> has sent a R2T, is it ok for the target to send a task management >> response with Function Complete, before the initiator has sent the >> data-out pdus for the R2T? It looks like the reason the target will do >> this is due to a internal target timeout (target did not get the >> data-outs within some timeout period). >> >> If the target does return the task management function with Function >> Complete, should the initiator continue to respond to the R2Ts? >> > > > The initiator doesn't have to send more data but since more data may be > still in flight > it shouldn't harm to send a "terminating" Dataout. Target should behave OK > in both cases. >
Ok I was wrong. To handle this we need to modify your patches to handle if sendpage or the iser or cxgb3i equivalent wants to return a failure. I am not sure how to do this nicely. I will do some thinking. Feel free to send a patch or post an idea before me. I have to help the qlogic and beiscsi guys real quick. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
