On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:03:59PM -0800, ByteEnable wrote: > This was achieved by using cache. >
What cache? Obviously the iscsi targets were ramdisks, but what do you mean with caching? -- Pasi > On Jan 28, 6:36 am, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > Please check these news > > items:http://blog.fosketts.net/2010/01/14/microsoft-intel-push-million-iscs...http://communities.intel.com/community/openportit/server/blog/2010/01...http://www.infostor.com/index/blogs_new/dave_simpson_storage/blogs/in... > > > > "1,030,000 IOPS over a single 10 Gb Ethernet link" > > > > "Specifically, Intel and Microsoft clocked 1,030,000 IOPS (with 512-byte > > blocks), > > and more than 2,250MBps with large block sizes (16KB to 256KB) using the > > Iometer benchmark" > > > > So.. who wants to beat that using Linux + open-iscsi? :) > > > > -- Pasi > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "open-iscsi" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
