FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
If vendors use the common data structures via bsg, it's totally fine by me. I see why bsg is preferable. The only thing that I care about is managing any iSCSI HBA with iscsiadm instead of various vendor specific utilities.
agreed
About the implementation, I think that it's better to have the common library code rather than just copying the fs bsg code into iscsi.
Note: I tried to library-ize the transport implementation on the first pass of the RFC. But it was making things more complex. I tried to explain this, perhaps not very well (http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=125725904205688&w=2).
-- james s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
