On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 13:35 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 13:36 +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> > Christopher Barry, on 06/10/2010 03:09 AM wrote:
> > > Greetings everyone,
> > > 
> > > Had a question about implementing mc/s using open-iscsi today. Wasn't
> > > really sure exactly what it was. From googling about, I can't find any
> > > references of people doing it with open-iscsi, although I see a few
> > > references to people asking about it. Anyone know the status on that?
> > 
> > http://scst.sourceforge.net/mc_s.html. In short, there's no point in it 
> > worth implementation and maintenance effort.
> 
> Heh, this URL is a bunch of b*llshit handwaving because the iscsi-scst
> target does not support the complete set of features defined by
> RFC-3720, namely MC/S and ErrorRecoveryLevel=2, let alone asymmeteric
> logical unit access (ALUA) MPIO.   Vlad, if you are so sure that MC/S is
> so awful, why don't you put your money where your mouth is and start
> asking these questions on the IETF IPS list and see what Julian Satran
> (the RFC editor) has to say about them..?  
> 
> Hmmmm...?
> 

Btw, just for those following along, here is what MC/S and ERL=2 when
used in combination (yes, they are complementary) really do:

http://linux-iscsi.org/builds/user/nab/Inter.vs.OuterNexus.Multiplexing.pdf

Also, I should mention in all fairness that my team was the first to
implement both a Target and Initiator capable of MC/S and
ErrorRecoveryLevel=2 running on Linux, and the first target capable of
running MC/S from multiple initiator implementations.

Unfortuately Vlad has never implemented any of these features in either
a target or initiator, so really he is not in a position to say what is
'good' or what is 'bad' about MC/S.

Best,

--nab

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.

Reply via email to