On 11/30/22 12:08, Mike Christie wrote:
On 11/30/22 1:53 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
Have you already worked on the open-iscsi side of this? No reason for duplicate
development.
I think you missed his reply where he said he was missed the
iscsid.safe_logout setting.
No, I saw that, but I thought there were some cases that might be missed
by checking for mounts. I also think having to set "safe" mode globally
is inefficient, but that's a separate issue.
Was the plan to retrace the changes submitted and accepted upstream for
adding a sysfs entry for node_startup that won't be used? Or is the plan
to populate that attribute for user consumption, even though it isn't
needed for this particular problem?
--
Lee
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-iscsi/9ffb9d42-8ae7-6547-cc5c-1254410a999f%40suse.com.
