Thanks Marc, How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not where the key needs to go.
Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few others. Minor issues: - The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1
files, which are unnecessary.
They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check though). - The source distribution contains a derby.log file at:
<source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log
This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another release candidate. The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate. On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a little easier to manage. On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing >> phase had access to the stylesheets. > > Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain > dependencies? > > -Patrick > > -- > Patrick Linskey > BEA Systems, Inc. > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > contain > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and > affiliated > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted > and/or > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > individual > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > recipient, > and have received this message in error, please immediately return > this > by email and then delete it. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM >> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release >> >> >> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote: >> >>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is >>>> unclear; this is: >>>> <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip >>> >>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the >> docs, but >>> not by the runtime. >> >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml, >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing >> phase had access to the stylesheets. >> >> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to >> the exclude list (revision 530094). >> >> >> >> >> > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries > and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, > copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for > the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you > are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in > error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
-- -Michael Dick
