Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release

[Craig L Russell]

On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

... but we can run the incubator and the openjpa votes in parallel,

happy, then we could rebuild and start off those two votes at the same
time.

right? If we're pretty sure that with the removal of that jar, we'll be

Yes, this is true.

Craig

-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.

by email and then delete it.

______________________________________________________________________ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:30 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release

Hi Mike,

On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:

I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need

to resolve

the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the

extra jar then

the vote can proceed.

If I go back and remove the jar, republish etc. I'm assuming we'll
have to restart the clock on the vote, correct me if I'm

wrong in this

regard.

Yes, changing the bits restarts the clock.

Craig

On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For the record, I'm still

+1 for release.

But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that

have been

surfaced, it's ok with me.

Craig

On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:

Mike--

 RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org

and check

the KEYS file out directly into

/www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/

directory.  No uploading necessary!  :)

 To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could

mostly

be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after

they're

uploaded.  I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do
whatever the community feels is best.  Certainly, it's

fine to ship

them for 0.9.7.

Cheers,
Eddie



On 4/18/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks Marc,

How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
KEYS ?  The
only documentation I've found indicates that I need to

upload it,

but not where the key needs to go.

Before I create another release candidate (to remove

the docbook

jar), should we try to address the other minor issues?

Craig and

Patrick have responded to most of them, but there are a few
others.

Minor issues:

- The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the

.md5 and .sha1

files, which are unnecessary.

They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since

they aren't

hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them

though. I

think the gpg plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1

files too

(I'd have to

check

though).

- The source distribution contains a derby.log file at:

 <source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log

This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that

before I create

another release candidate.

The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to.

If any of

them can be fixed quickly then we can include them in the new
release

candidate.

On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make

things a

little easier to manage.



On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

This is there because we draw in all the

dependencies that we

don't explicitly exclude in the

openjpa-project/assembly.xml,

and at some point, someone (probably me) added

docbook-xsl as

a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
phase had access to the stylesheets.

Is it possible to invert that, so that we only

include certain

dependencies?

-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________

_

_
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,

may

contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,

copyrighted

and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the

use of the

individual or entity named in this message. If you

are not the

intended recipient, and have received this message

in error,

please immediately

return

this
by email and then delete it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Prud'hommeaux

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa

0.9.7-incubating release

On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

- The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose

license is

unclear; this is:
  <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip

That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the

docs, but

not by the runtime.

This is there because we draw in all the

dependencies that we

don't explicitly exclude in the

openjpa-project/assembly.xml,

and at some point, someone (probably me) added

docbook-xsl as

a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
phase had access to the stylesheets.

I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by

adding it to

the exclude list (revision 530094).

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments,

may

contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its

subsidiaries

and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,

proprietary,

copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is

intended solely

for

the use of the individual or entity named in this message.

If you

are not the intended recipient, and have received this

message in

error, please immediately return this by email and

then delete

it.

--
-Michael Dick

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System

http://java.sun.com/products/

jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

--
-Michael Dick

Craig Russell

Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo

408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature