Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release

[Craig L Russell]

For the record, I'm still

+1 for release.



Craig

On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:

But if you want to cut another to fix the minor items that have been surfaced, it's ok with me.

Mike--

 RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check
the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
directory.  No uploading necessary!  :)

 To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly
be cleaned up just by deleting the directories / files after they're
uploaded.  I don't have strong feelings about them, so just do
whatever the community feels is best.  Certainly, it's fine to ship
them for 0.9.7.

Cheers,
Eddie



On 4/18/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks Marc,

How do I upload my key to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/ KEYS ? The only documentation I've found indicates that I need to upload it, but not

where the key needs to go.


responded to most of them, but there are a few others.

Minor issues:

- The .zip distribution contains .asc files for the .md5 and .sha1
> files, which are unnecessary.



plugin for maven signs the .md5 and sha1 files too (I'd have to check
though).

- The source distribution contains a derby.log file at:
>  <source-dist>/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/derby.log



release candidate.


fixed quickly then we can include them in the new release candidate.

On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>

> little easier to manage.
>
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>
> >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we
> >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
> >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as
> >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
> >> phase had access to the stylesheets.
> >
> > Is it possible to invert that, so that we only include certain
> > dependencies?
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > BEA Systems, Inc.

> > _
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> > contain
> > information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> > affiliated
> > entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> > and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> > individual
> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> > recipient,

> > this
> > by email and then delete it.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:23 AM
> >> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> >>

> >>>> unclear; this is:
> >>>>   <binary-dist>/lib/docbook-xsl-1.67.2.zip
> >>>
> >>> That dependency is unnecessary -- it's needed to build the
> >> docs, but
> >>> not by the runtime.
> >>
> >> This is there because we draw in all the dependencies that we
> >> don't explicitly exclude in the openjpa-project/assembly.xml,
> >> and at some point, someone (probably me) added docbook-xsl as
> >> a dependency so as to ensure that the docbook processing
> >> phase had access to the stylesheets.
> >>
> >> I've gone ahead and fixed this in the trunk by adding it to
> >> the exclude list (revision 530094).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> > contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries

> > the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you
> > are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in

>
>


--
-Michael Dick

Before I create another release candidate (to remove the docbook jar), should we try to address the other minor issues? Craig and Patrick have They're unnecessary, but I've been ignoring them since they aren't hurting anything. It isn't too hard to get rid of them though. I think the gpg This is pretty easy to clean up, and I'll do that before I create another The other issues Craig and Patrick have responded to. If any of them can be > Good idea ... I've gone ahead and done that. It should make things a > > _____________________________________________________________________ _ > > and have received this message in error, please immediately return > >>>> - The binary distribution contains a new JAR file whose license is > > and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, > > copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for > > error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature