On May 6, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:+1 to the change.What do you think about changing dir names so that openjpa-all becomesopenjpa-dist or something?Do you mean changing "openjpa-project" (which is the distribution) to "openjpa-dist"?We could, although it wouldn't impact the artifact names.
I think the important thing is the artifact names. Once we agree on the artifact names, we can choose to rename the directories to suit.
-Patrick On 5/6/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Poking around the ActiveMQ pom.xml files, I notice that you can havea different artifactId than the module name (i.e., directory) you arein. I hadn't known you could do this. Currently, our artifacts name are: trunk/pom.xml: openjpa trunk/openjpa-all/pom.xml: openjpa-all trunk/openjpa-project/pom.xml: openjpa-project We could change these to: trunk/pom.xml: openjpa-parent trunk/openjpa-all/pom.xml: openjpa trunk/openjpa-project/pom.xml: apache-openjpa I've tested this out, and it results in the openjpa aggregate jar being named "openjpa-VERSION.jar", the dependency being simply named "openjpa", and the assembly is named "apache-openjpa-VERSION.zip".None of the directories needed to be renamed. I've attached the patchthat does this to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-194 Since this will mess up people who currently have maven dependencieson OpenJPA (i.e., people who depend on "openjpa-all" will now need to depend on "openjpa"), we should probably get this hammered out beforeleaving incubation. So I've gone ahead and turned the [DISCUSS] into a [VOTE] to see if we should go ahead and do this.A vote of +1 means we should do the renaming, -1 means we should not,and 0 means "don't care". The vote will remain open until Wednesday May 9th at 23:59 GMT. On May 4, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Michael Dick wrote: > Some comments below > > On 5/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'd like reopen the discussion on how to package and name our >> artifacts. I think the current setup could be improved, to give a >> better experience for users who might not be using maven for >> dependency management. It's easy for us to change now before>> graduation because once we graduate, people will need to update their >> dependencies anyway so there are no backward compatibility issues.>>>> The name of the single jar that has all of the openjpa stuff in it>> except for the documentation and examples is currently called >> openjpa->> all. This name is confusing because unless they RTFM, people don't>> really know that it's not all the code you need, just all the jpa >> code. So I'd like to call this artifact openjpa. > > > +1 >> But we already have a project with that name, and that project builds >> the distributions. So I'd rename the current openjpa to openjpa-dist.>> Its ultimate destination in the Apache mirror structure is under>> www.apache.org/dist/openjpa once we graduate, so having dist in the>> project name helps understanding that this project builds the >> artifacts that go into dist. Separate from the artifacts that are >> published via maven. > > > +1 > > Finally, the openjpa-all jar includes its subcomponents as>> dependencies. I think this is wrong, since you end up with a class >> path with openjpa-all.jar as well as openjpa-kernel.jar and all the>> others. > > > I would like to change this too. I did a little experimenting and > it looks > like the dependencies aren't needed in openjpa-all, but they are > needed for > openjpa-project (to populate the lib directory). Moving the > dependencies > into openjpa-project should be safe. >> We're also going to need to change the deploy logic to strip out the> -project suffix from the zip files. We've talked about it before > when I was > releasing 0.9.7 (and before that when Marc was working on 0.9.6), > but I> haven't had time to look into it. It should be fairly easy to make the> change. > > > Thoughts? >> >> Craig >> >> Craig Russell>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ products/>> jdo >> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> >> >> > -Michael Dick-- Patrick Linskey 202 669 5907
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature