On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:45:19PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Because that is the standard place kernel modules should go, according
> > to the FHS.  Have I misunderstood the question?
> 
> Yes, you have misunderstood the question.  OpenAFS is not part of the
> Linux Kernel (indeed, it is not Linux-specific in any way).  It
> provides its own location and loading methods for its module.  Why are
> you bypassing those and then trying to backfeed into OpenAFS?  Unless,
> of course, this is in preparation for a Linux kernel code-drop?

Where else would one put a module?  At least the Debian openafs
packages install it in the kernel module directory and load it from
there, which seems the most logical place.


Dan

/--------------------------------\  /--------------------------------\
|       Daniel Jacobowitz        |__|        SCS Class of 2002       |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer    __    Carnegie Mellon University   |
|         [EMAIL PROTECTED]         |  |       [EMAIL PROTECTED]      |
\--------------------------------/  \--------------------------------/
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel

Reply via email to