On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:26:27PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I should point out that I'm not against the patch. Indeed, the patch
> should be added to the 2.2 config file as well. In the end, I would
> like to see the OpenAFS kernel code integrated into the Linux kernel
> (but that's a different thread for a different night ;) I'm just
> pointing out that when you change OpenAFS to meet your own
> requirements, you should not expect the OpenAFS developers to bend
> over backwards to solve the problems you induced.
Can I take a step back here?
Having the module in that location has NOTHING AT ALL to do with
modversions. I had the same problem, and a similar patch that I forgot
to submit, when I first touched OpenAFS. There's no bending over
backwards involved in working with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS.
The changing file paths are just cosmetic.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
