Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:45:19PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Michael Welsh Duggan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Because that is the standard place kernel modules should go, according
> > > to the FHS. Have I misunderstood the question?
> >
> > Yes, you have misunderstood the question. OpenAFS is not part of the
> > Linux Kernel (indeed, it is not Linux-specific in any way). It
> > provides its own location and loading methods for its module. Why are
> > you bypassing those and then trying to backfeed into OpenAFS? Unless,
> > of course, this is in preparation for a Linux kernel code-drop?
>
> Where else would one put a module? At least the Debian openafs
> packages install it in the kernel module directory and load it from
> there, which seems the most logical place.
And I will admit that that is precisely why I put it there. I have
been using the debian packaging of the openafs sources.
--
Michael Duggan
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
