On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > 2. If yes, is it agreeable that the "vos estimate" approach is the > preferred one to proceed with?
IMO yes > 3. If yes again, is there any preference what RPC opcode to use next, > or should we just take the next free one and go with it? [EMAIL PROTECTED] will allocate you one, which will be the first one available above 65535. (we're trying to stay out of space IBM might use) _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
