Mitch Collinsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Love wrote: > >> Mitch Collinsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > We could also just take the size from vos >> > examine, but some quick experiments with this showed inacuracies as >> > large as 4%, which we feel is unacceptable. >> >> In what direction was it wrong ? > > Not consistent. (!)
You looked at the same volume clone (backup) ? You are sure the you just did have the quota bug triggered volumes confusing you ? >> Did you the overhead of file/directory-metadata stored in the dump (number >> of files are stored in volintInfo.files) > > The inaccuracy I'm talking about here is just the difference observed > between the size shown in vos examine and the actual true size of a > vos dump. Our estimator utility gets it exactly right every time, by > looking at the actual metadata stored in the volume. I don't think the dump should be smaller the the quota information, if it is, something else is wrong. Love _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
