On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:

>> would it be better to have <ip version="4" address="192.168.1.1" /> ?
>> Would that be better to anticipate ipv6?
> 
> No, I don't think so.  IMHO it is better to think of IPv6 as a different 
> protocol, rather than as a new version of an existing protocol.  

Surely there must be some prior art on how to express ipv4 vs. ipv6 in 
XML?_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to