On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:

> Steve Simmons <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>> 
>>>> would it be better to have <ip version="4" address="192.168.1.1" /> ?
>>>> Would that be better to anticipate ipv6?
>>> 
>>> No, I don't think so.  IMHO it is better to think of IPv6 as a different 
>>> protocol, rather than as a new version of an existing protocol.  
>> 
>> Surely there must be some prior art on how to express ipv4 vs. ipv6 in
>> XML?___
> 
> Ascii format?

I'm thinking tags and dtd, not the 
value._______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to