Joe, in https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openafs+branch:master+topic:linux48 I only see a single change, and is on the 1.6 branch (commit 92b1ddf), though not in a release yet. I doubt it's required to successfully build and run on Linux 4.9.
What am I missing? - Stephan > On 10. Apr 2017, at 15:41, Joe Gorse <[email protected]> wrote: > > Todd, > > Looking at our code review app: > https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/q/linux > > I see a 4.8 (linux48 branch name) patch which is only on the master branch, > so I would start there for now. > > Cheers, > Joe > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Todd Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a straightforward way to figure out which pieces of > git://git.openafs.org/openafs.git could be used to test on Linux 4.10.x? I > know > running Fedora comes with the risk that the kernel gets ahead of out-of-tree > modules, and that the volunteers keeping OpenAFS alive prefer to release > tested > software. So I get that there are times like now when the choice is between > running older kernels or pre-release (or not-yet-written) code. But this is a > personal desktop, not a production service machine, so thin ice is an > acceptable > choice. Besides, if I can help out with some testing I'm glad to do that. > > Having said all that, and having crawled around the repo with my novice level > git foo, I have not found anything like, "Those willing to crash and burn with > the latest kernels could try this, this, and that." I'm willing, but > insufficiently en-clued. > > Thanks. -- Stephan Wiesand DESY -DV- Platanenallee 6 15738 Zeuthen, Germany _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
