Stephan,

I believe you have got it. I see it in 1_6_x now and it is more of a
development-related patch anyway.

Todd, you should be good to go on 1_6_x or master branch.

Cheers,
Joe

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Stephan Wiesand <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Joe,
>
> in https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/q/status:merged+project:
> openafs+branch:master+topic:linux48
> I only see a single change, and is on the 1.6 branch (commit 92b1ddf),
> though not in a release yet. I doubt it's required to successfully build
> and run on Linux 4.9.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> - Stephan
>
> > On 10. Apr 2017, at 15:41, Joe Gorse <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Todd,
> >
> > Looking at our code review app:
> > https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/q/linux
> >
> > I see a 4.8 (linux48 branch name) patch which is only on the master
> branch, so I would start there for now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Joe
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Todd Lewis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Is there a straightforward way to figure out which pieces of
> > git://git.openafs.org/openafs.git could be used to test on Linux
> 4.10.x? I know
> > running Fedora comes with the risk that the kernel gets ahead of
> out-of-tree
> > modules, and that the volunteers keeping OpenAFS alive prefer to release
> tested
> > software. So I get that there are times like now when the choice is
> between
> > running older kernels or pre-release (or not-yet-written) code. But this
> is a
> > personal desktop, not a production service machine, so thin ice is an
> acceptable
> > choice. Besides, if I can help out with some testing I'm glad to do that.
> >
> > Having said all that, and having crawled around the repo with my novice
> level
> > git foo, I have not found anything like, "Those willing to crash and
> burn with
> > the latest kernels could try this, this, and that." I'm willing, but
> > insufficiently en-clued.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> --
> Stephan Wiesand
> DESY -DV-
> Platanenallee 6
> 15738 Zeuthen, Germany
>
>
>
>


-- 
Joe Gorse

C: 440-552-0730
LI: Joe Gorse <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/joe-gorse/7/12/397>

Reply via email to