Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nathan Neulinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any particular reason not to just use syslog() period?
>
> Probably okay for volume releases and the like, but if you wanted to
> log everything kaserver does (like we do), the volume is way too
> high for syslog.
I think this choice is better made by the particular site. It would
be very nice to have syslog (with a configurable facility) as an
option for all of the AFS servers.
Our Linux mail server generates over 30M of mail logs per day, and it
has not been a problem. Having all the logs use a single mechanism is
a huge win both for log rotation and for automated monitoring.
- Pat
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-info
