Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Patrick J LoPresti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think this choice is better made by the particular site. It would be
> > very nice to have syslog (with a configurable facility) as an option for
> > all of the AFS servers.
>
> I suppose. I definitely would never use it for the kaserver at least
> until we manage to convert to Kerberos v5.
>
> > Our Linux mail server generates over 30M of mail logs per day,
>
> (a) Linux's syslogd is considerably more robust than that on many other
> platforms, and also has the option of writing unbuffered log files.
> Solaris's syslogd is notoriously bad.
>
> (b) Our kaserver logs are three times that.
Just as a note - you might consider replacing your syslogd with
something more capable such as syslog-ng.
-- Nathan
------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841
CIS - Systems Programming Fax: (573) 341-4216
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-info
