Patrick J LoPresti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this choice is better made by the particular site. It would be
> very nice to have syslog (with a configurable facility) as an option for
> all of the AFS servers.
I suppose. I definitely would never use it for the kaserver at least
until we manage to convert to Kerberos v5.
> Our Linux mail server generates over 30M of mail logs per day,
(a) Linux's syslogd is considerably more robust than that on many other
platforms, and also has the option of writing unbuffered log files.
Solaris's syslogd is notoriously bad.
(b) Our kaserver logs are three times that.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-info
