On Nov 22, 2005, at 8:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why the AFS community continues to support this
convention which breaks location independence. *shrug*.
Okay, "support" was a bad choice of words, why its supported should
be pretty obvious. It'd still be nice to see some alternatives
more widely discussed.
How about some suggestions or even better, code?
Maybe I'm too used to the concept, the way it is now, but I don't
have any problems with that.
I never had.
Sorry, but I don't see your point. What exactly is breaking location
independence?
Horst
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
