getcacheparms doesn't seem descriptive to me.

I propose that an alias be created for fs getcacheparms.

I suggest "fs getcacheusage", "fs cacheusage" or something else that is more descriptive than getcacheparms.

Any opinions?

Sincerely,
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to