Derrick Brashear wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 7:37 PM, Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
getcacheparms doesn't seem descriptive to me.
I propose that an alias be created for fs getcacheparms.
I suggest "fs getcacheusage", "fs cacheusage" or something else that is
more descriptive than getcacheparms.
meh.
"fs getcache" works now.
so it does. Now, to just update the docs.
Should aliases show up in fs help?
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
