On Jan 30, 2008 7:37 PM, Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > getcacheparms doesn't seem descriptive to me. > > I propose that an alias be created for fs getcacheparms. > > I suggest "fs getcacheusage", "fs cacheusage" or something else that is > more descriptive than getcacheparms. >
meh. "fs getcache" works now.
