>> There is a lot of misinformation about Ubik out there; the voting >> protocol is actually not complicated, it's just not documented well. > >it's actually well-documented, if you find Kazar's paper on Quorum Completion.
You know, we should try to find a copy of that and put it somewhere useful. >From what I remember (I think I saw a copy once), the paper gets you about 80% of the way there; the source code gets you the rest of the way. Actually, I now realize that I _do_ have a copy of it. Can we put it on the OpenAFS web site? I just have the PostScript; it's easy enough to convert that to PDF. >> If your database servers are accessable via the Internet, we could take >> a look at them via udebug. Really, there are only a few things that can >> go wrong; of all of the pieces of AFS, I think Ubik is one of the most >> bulletproof. > >There are a couple (unlikely) open issues; See RT. Didn't know about those. Still, I think we need more information to diagnose the original problem. --Ken _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info