Andrew Deason <[email protected]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:
>> * In the long term, we want to remove LWP and build all parts of >> OpenAFS against POSIX pthreads. This has no time frame yet since it >> depends on other work that's not yet complete. It obviously depends >> on completion of the pthreaded Ubik work, which I don't believe is >> in a state that's ready to recommend as of 1.6, so will continue to >> be optional in that release. > While I agree, I feel compelled to note that there aren't any known > issues with pthreaded ubik right now (it's been removed as a newsletter > project since it's "done"). What's required is wider testing for it to > be more 'ready', I think. This makes me think we should enable it by default on master once we've branched for 1.6. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
