Derrick Brashear schrieb:
Considering it a showstopper when you admit one graph earlier that
you're already running with a patched tree seems a bit overblown,
perhaps? The tree is now gold and patches may no longer be applied?
No, of course not.
It would be painful to have to put back the '--enable-fast-restart and
--enable-bitmap-later' code if you removed them, probably dangerous. My plea
is to keep them in as an alternative to the demand-attach file-server: with
mandatory salvaging the non-demand-attach case is seriously impaired, hence
disabling it is no real alternative.
With the ambitious schedule for new releases I see this happening very
quickly. I'd like to avoid having to stop at a particular release next year
because of a functionality that we manage to live without, and miss others
that we're interested in.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rainer Toebbicke
European Laboratory for Particle Physics(CERN) - Geneva, Switzerland
Phone: +41 22 767 8985 Fax: +41 22 767 7155
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
