|
With a non-\\AFS network share, the server actually exists and
responds to the request. Therefore there is no delay. The core
issue here is a design difference between XP and Vista. In XP, when a \\server\share search is performed, all of the network providers installed on the machine are queried and the answer is delivered when all of the network providers have responded. If the AFS network provider responds immediately and the SMB (LanMan) network provider doesn't return for 30 seconds, the answer provided by the AFS network provider is not delivered to the application (e.g., explorer shell) for 30 seconds. In Vista, when a \\server\share search is performed, all of the network providers installed on the machine are queried but the first response is the one that is used and the request of the outstanding queries are ignored. If the 10.254.254.253 entry in LMHOSTS is not preventing the delays, it means that the system believes that the net is accessible and the LanMan network provider is timing out trying to receive a response. You can watch this using WireShark or Microsoft Network Monitor both of which are free to download and install. There are no delays when accessing \\AFS UNC paths from the command line because the afsredir.sys driver has already registered all paths beginning with \\AFS with the Multiple UNC Provider (UNC) interface in the kernel. This is strictly an issue with the network provider interface and applications that use the WNet APIs to browse. This is not a problem on Vista, Server 2008 or Windows 7. There are no changes in 1.7.4 to address this because at the moment I'm not sure what can be done. Jeffrey Altman On 12/20/2011 8:02 AM, John W. Sopko Jr. wrote: I have been out of town, thus the reply delay. I had openafs 1.5.x installed, my lmhosts file looks like this: |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
