Impressive. I would have imagined that the official CF would have been the most forgiving. Perhaps not in the areas there were tested.
Extremely interesting. Thank you for taking the time to share this information. Warm regards, Jordan Michaels Vivio Technologies http://www.viviotech.net/ Open BlueDragon Steering Committee Adobe Solution Provider WebFlint wrote: > I put together a series of 140 unit tests testing how components where > implemented in the three major engines - ColdFusion, Open BlueDragon, > and Railo. > > A majority of the tests were to compare the result of access attribute > combinations in cfc functions within the context of their call - > variables, super, this, inherited, etc. > > For example, > > this.super.myFunction() > > only works on Railo and not CF. Things get much weirder when you > start changing the access of the functions... > > The results were: 140 Total Tests: > > Railo > 134 pass 6 fail > > OpenBD > 109 pass 31 fail > > ColdFusion > 94 pass 46 fail > > The overview and chart can be viewed here (both hosted at > assembla.com): > > http://tr.im/jDZf > > and for those ultra curious, the test case code can be browsed or > check out here: > > http://tr.im/jtQn > > I'd also like to say I'm really excited about CFML advisory committee > and hope to see a convergence between the three on a standard. > > cheers, > > .brett > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
