Alan,

I think the main thing I see is the ecosystem of third-party software -
including closed and open source applications - that depend on a CFML
server. The more, the better - isn't that true? 

--
Hugo Ahlenius
fraxinus (at-sign) oxel.net
http://www.oxel.net 





| -----Original Message-----
| From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
| Of Alan Williamson
| Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:09
| To: [email protected]
| Subject: Re: CFML Component Compatibility Chart
| 
| 
| For example, Brett run this test and discovered that Railo passed the
| most and ColdFusion failed the most.   That is how he presented it.  Me,
| i read that as saying Railo failed the most, as we all unofficially
| accept ColdFusion is the standard.
| 
| So out of 140 tests, Railo differed (40 differences) from the "standard"
| the most, where as OpenBD only differed in 15.
| 
| We have to be very careful how we interpret and setup such tests.
| 
| While this is interesting ... but let me pose something here to get the
| discussions flowing.
| 
| Do we really need a tight standard?
| 
| In whose interests is it to adhere to?   Yes we could build the most
| "standardised" engine out there, but it's of no use if the others don't
| implement the same.  So is it really a standard then?
| 
| The vast majority of people in my experience, rarely move engines once
| development has started, and the only people that really seem to care
| are the ones building the standard frameworks.   Of course they want
| life to be easier so they can only create one version.
| 
| Yes all the engines strive to match each other as close as possible, but
| to the CFML developer on the frontline, has it really lost you any money
| at the moment __NOT__ having a true tag-4-tag function-4-function
| compatibility?
| 
| 
| 
| 
| On 29/04/2009 01:32, WebFlint wrote:
| > I'd also like to say I'm really excited about CFML advisory committee
| > and hope to see a convergence between the three on a standard.
| 
| 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
 official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/

!! save a network - trim replies before posting !!
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to