P.S. The "this.super.myFunction()" syntax seems pretty silly to me.
On May 1, 12:28 pm, [email protected] wrote: > I'm a little late to this discussion, but I'd like to protest here. > Who decided that "this.super.myFunction()" is valid CFML? If it > doesn't work on ColdFusion, how can it be valid? Our approach to > compatibility for BlueDragon has always been that ColdFusion is the > reference implementation. > > To create testcases like this and then say (in effect), "Look how > great Railo is because it passes all these tests that CF and BD fail" > is just bogus. You can claim this as a Railo enhancement, but don't > put the "fail" label on CF and BD. That's no different than if I ran > testcases for BD-specific enhancements on CF and Railo, and then > listed all their "failures." > > On Apr 28, 8:32 pm, WebFlint <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I put together a series of 140 unit tests testing how components where > > ...snip... > > > > > For example, > > > this.super.myFunction() > > > only works on Railo and not CF. Things get much weirder when you > > start changing the access of the functions... > > ...snip... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
