I'm a little late to this discussion, but I'd like to protest here. Who decided that "this.super.myFunction()" is valid CFML? If it doesn't work on ColdFusion, how can it be valid? Our approach to compatibility for BlueDragon has always been that ColdFusion is the reference implementation.
To create testcases like this and then say (in effect), "Look how great Railo is because it passes all these tests that CF and BD fail" is just bogus. You can claim this as a Railo enhancement, but don't put the "fail" label on CF and BD. That's no different than if I ran testcases for BD-specific enhancements on CF and Railo, and then listed all their "failures." On Apr 28, 8:32 pm, WebFlint <[email protected]> wrote: > I put together a series of 140 unit tests testing how components where ...snip... > > For example, > > this.super.myFunction() > > only works on Railo and not CF. Things get much weirder when you > start changing the access of the functions... > ...snip... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
