Interesting timing on this... I had started a project just last week for the same stuff, but a little more broad sweeping. Hit me up off list Brett! a dot haskell @ gmail
Adam On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:32 PM, WebFlint <[email protected]> wrote: > > I put together a series of 140 unit tests testing how components where > implemented in the three major engines - ColdFusion, Open BlueDragon, > and Railo. > > A majority of the tests were to compare the result of access attribute > combinations in cfc functions within the context of their call - > variables, super, this, inherited, etc. > > For example, > > this.super.myFunction() > > only works on Railo and not CF. Things get much weirder when you > start changing the access of the functions... > > The results were: 140 Total Tests: > > Railo > 134 pass 6 fail > > OpenBD > 109 pass 31 fail > > ColdFusion > 94 pass 46 fail > > The overview and chart can be viewed here (both hosted at > assembla.com): > > http://tr.im/jDZf > > and for those ultra curious, the test case code can be browsed or > check out here: > > http://tr.im/jtQn > > I'd also like to say I'm really excited about CFML advisory committee > and hope to see a convergence between the three on a standard. > > cheers, > > .brett > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
