On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Alan Holden <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't know about 1.3 - but there have been known issues with regard to
> the difference in the structure of queries that are returned by OpenBD web
> services, vs. the same code being run in Adobe ColdFusion. I hear the former
> is more compatible with .NET;


Actually as Vince pointed out the last time this came up, that's not an
accurate assessment of the reasoning behind the difference:
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd/msg/f57d3a2097d882fc

Full thread here:
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd/browse_thread/thread/403f36df50c69ce5/f57d3a2097d882fc


> while I know the later is more compatible with Flex. Neither platform can
> communicate with each other where queries exchanged via wsdl are concerned -
> last time I checked. I don't know which version is the accepted committee
> standard actually.
>

If by "committee" you mean the CFML Advisory Committee, I don't believe we
ever even broached this topic.


>
> I recall some thread on the possibility of a property to option this output
> on the OpenBD side, but I don't know if it got any traction. But since I was
> able to write a little ActionScript workaround on the Flex side, I've kept
> mostly quiet on that issue.
>
>
As always if there isn't already a feature request ticket you can submit one
here:
http://code.google.com/p/openbluedragon/issues/list
-- 
Matthew Woodward
[email protected]
http://blog.mattwoodward.com
identi.ca/Twitter: @mpwoodward

Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint,
etc. as attachments.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-- 
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
 http://www.openbluedragon.org/   http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
 mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

 !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!

Reply via email to