On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am all for moving onto a new ajax framework or learning to do this
> differently, I just haven't the time to find a suitable replacement, so by
> all means point me to a better place.  What I mainly use ajax for is to
> send data to a CFC for table updates as well as returning queries.
>

You can do that directly in OpenBD. No external framework needed. The only
reason cfajax ever existed is because this stuff wasn't in the CFML engines
back in the CF 6/7 days.

If you're doing simple HTTP calls to your CFCs just set access to remote
and call away.
http://www.openbd.org/manual/?/webservices_restlet

If you want to call your CFCs directly from JavaScript, use CFAJAXPROXY:
http://www.openbd.org/manual/?/tag/CFAJAXPROXY


> The only confusing part for me is I thought a return from OpenBD would be
> in the same format as CF8 and therefore the answers I get from OpenBD would
> be the same answers out of CF8.  This, thru testing clearly is not the
> case, and the reason for believing it to be a bug.
>

Oh believe me what you get via ajax directly from OpenBD Is FAR better than
what you get out of CF 8. We've done a lot of work in that area,
particularly around the JSON data, and I think you'll find it's quite nice.

-- 
Matthew Woodward
[email protected]
http://blog.mattwoodward.com
identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward

Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint,
etc. as attachments.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-- 
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
   google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462
     http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

Reply via email to