Well if nothing else it's a function that should be there for compatibility purposes, so it's a win in my book. Thanks Alan!
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Alan Holden <[email protected]> wrote: > I was being cynical by my comment, and agree with you 100% > Al > > On 5/21/2012 4:11 PM, Alan Williamson wrote: > > > On 21/05/2012 13:34, Alan Holden wrote: > > P.S. A fast-growing programming framework for CFML? Finally! > > > but isn't CFML already a programming framework?!? > > why is this community so hell bent in re-inventing the wheel (literally in > this case!) > > (snip) > > -- > online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ > http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
