On 31/01/2014 12:39, Alan Holden wrote:
Done. My only real concern about CFML in general, is the ongoing
support for OpenBD in particular.
Do not worry on that front. OpenBD is continually updated, we just
don't formally release versions to be honest with you, and it is
something we've been toying with in terms of a continual build/release
cycle. By the time we are committing code to the base, its been
thoroughly tested, and rarely have we had to back out a change.
So we may just keep the nightly builds and keep some previously
changes. It is something Andy and I are talking about.
But we use OpenBD very aggressively with our projects and are
continually looking at ways to improve the engine. It is no secret
that I personally have no interest to be feature compatible with any
other alternatives; if people want a feature, then ask and we'll
consider it, or we'll accept code submissions. But the days of an
official CFML standard are long gone.
When i describe OpenBD to others I merely say its CFML based in its
origins, but then don't discuss the CFML language at all. It's just a
powerful web scripting language as far as i am concerned.
CFML as a language IMHO has its day of being the cool-kid-on-the-block.
--
--
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open BlueDragon" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
