Michael, On Thursday 17 June 2004 14:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > there is an area "export/import commits" which do the serial handling. I > planned to replace the simple textfile by a dbm-file with a btree which > should be much faster (log n instead of n per access) but I had no time > until now. The implementation should be really easy because we only need > the index functionality of DBM. The filenames has not be changed.
OK, this sounds good. > So if you have some time then you can start of course a small project to > fix it :) I will have some time in the next week. So perhaps I can have a > look at this stuff. It should be some kind of copy and paste from logging > or db stuff. I am much happier you doing it, if you have time, as my coding (as you have seen in the past) is not really up to scratch !!! I am happy doing small bug fixes. I think I am better utilised in the volume testing area !! On a slightly different note, is there an OpenCA development road map anywhere ? I have looked through the 0.9.2 RC5 TODO file on CVS but this shows very specific coding tasks rather than a broader development plan. I am thinking along the lines of... 0.9.4 Tested for volumes up to 100,000 certificates. 0.9.5 On line CA implemented. 0.9.6 PKIX CA interface implemented. 0.9.7 Volume tested up to 1,000,000 certificates. As you can see I am keen to know the current planned direction of OpenCA. Chris... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ OpenCA-Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-devel
