So, ra number 1 is
<name>ra_module_id</name>
<value>1</value>
</option>
<option>
<name>ldap_module_id</name>
<value>2</value>
</option>
<option>
<name>node_module_id</name>
<value>3</value>
</option>
<option>
<name>pub_module_id</name>
<value>32</value>
</option>
<option>
<name>scep_module_id</name>
<value>33</value>What should RA number 2,3... look like?
Thanks,
Michael Bell wrote:
Nuno Miguel Neves wrote:
Another problem is configuration-wise. I plan to have eight RA/pub/... all with virtual hosts.
So, I configure each one of them (config.xml) to have a different ra,pub, etc. section? Is this OK?
Yes, but please use a different module ID for every RA and pub to avoid conflicting serial numbers for requests. This can give a lot of trouble and the module IDs were introduced exactly for such situations.
BTW the dataexchange problem is in fact a linking problem and was found and fixed during a SCEP test.
Michael
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. Informatica, Fac. Ciencias,
|\ | |\ | Tel: +351 21 7500528 Univ. Lisboa, Bloco C5, Campo Grande
| \|uno | \|eves Fax: +351 21 7500084 1700 Lisboa, Portugal
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Openca-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users
