Hi,

After doing a little more reading in the user archive, it appears that one
-must- run the startup script as root. There are two server processes that
should run after startup - the XML cache and the OpenCA daemon and, by
default, they are run by the web server owner as specified in openca_start
(httpd_user, httpd_group). This makes sense to me now - it's a typical UNIX
startup script meant to be run at boot time and which switches to
appropriate users. So the reason for using openca_user and openca_group at
install time is to control OpenCA directory/file ownership.

Mike

> >
> > I got around this by setting both the openca-user and the httpd-user
> to
> > the web-server user, this isn't exactly right, but it seems as though
> > many of the permissions are done improperly. That many of the web
> > scripts receive the openca-user permissions and all the directories
> > receive the httpd-user permissions. I also was running these commands
> as
> > root. Also I had to turn off SELinux, or rather I didn't want to
> bother
> > worrying about it anymore.
> 
> Thanks, but I have everything running as openca.  I did turn off both
> iptables and SELinux.  Still no good.
> 
> Frustrating indeed.
> 
> Take it EZ,
> Robet
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Openca-Users mailing list
> Openca-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Openca-Users mailing list
Openca-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openca-users

Reply via email to