> At 5:48 AM -0700 on 5/8/99, Rob Cozens wrote:
>>>Anthony: A change has been made in that the two people receiving the most
>>>votes in
>>>any given category are elected. The person with the most votes becomes
>>>President; the other, Vice President.
>>
>>Rob: In that case, I suggest we consider "weighted voting": each person
>>indicates a first & second choice for each office. First choice gets two
>>votes and second choice gets one vote.
>
> Anthony: Sounds good. I wonder what we're doing to the one writing the voting
CGI <eg>
Adrian: Yes, this CGI is becoming more and more complex, I can deal with it
though. However, I'm not sure this weighted voting is fair. I would tend
to stick with voting for a president and a separate vote for vice-president.
They are two different roles, with different requirements. Also, we have
one nominee who only wants VP and I don't think I could handle being
President either, so that makes two. With this in mind, the two votes
really have to be separate.
