> 1. LICENSE shall mean an open source (e.g., free software) license
> which allows:
Anthony,
"open source" has a meaning, and is even trademarked, I think. This could
turn around our license behind our backs.
>1. I propose that there shall be a single MAINTAINER, to be shall be
>elected by the majority of the members of the OODL list and liable to
>removal by the same fraction. I propose that any single decision or group
>of decisions may be reversed by a majority vote, except for the provisions
>of this document, once adopted, may be modified or extended to the extent
>allowed by applicable law by a vote of two-thirds in the affirmative.
This would basically mean one person can fork, completely re-write the
license (he could perform a 100% vote to do this in his mind) and off they
go. We're at a complicated PD license again.
>1. I propose that there shall be two people elected by OODL to enter into a
>contract with MAINTAINER that states that in the event of his removal from
>office and the election of a successor he shall transfer legal possession of
>the OPENCARD trademark and the OPENCARD copyright to the new MAINTAINER.
Wouldn't my beloved CopyLeft be much easier and make things like this
obsolete?
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
