It's got my vote. Seems to me we are back at the
problem of who is going to run this boat and make
the final authoritative call.
Perhaps someone who disagrees with this solution
could speak up and present their opinion.
If no one has spoken up by let's say, next Wednesday,
then it would seem we would have the go ahead with this.
-- Michael --
DeRobertis wrote:
> At 11:54 PM +0200 on 8/12/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
>
> >Then why do you talk about the whole program in the license? It will only
> >disturb people like Mark trying to get on board. Rather, just say: "It's
> >PD, but the name belongs to us." Sounds too simple to work...
>
> OK, then, let's do that.
>
> Next question is who owns the trademark.
