Thanks Linas, Excellent work in pulling this all together!.
I glanced through the paper and hope to read it carefully over the weekend (or as much there is of it, when Sunday is a workday :-)) I noticed the interlinkages in the flow from text to linked syntax+some semantic graph to pattern matching to action identification (via verb) to something happening. Its like a well designed puzzle -- perhaps, a non-blind watch maker as it were, interlinking it all. I am going to look out for the blind watchmaker -- the ruminating, running flows of consciousnesses, whereby the linkage, say, occurs in the other direction or is otherwise emergent and with some meaning that maps somehow with the social real world ... hope i am making sense (at this late our of the night) Daniel On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 02:13:31 UTC+3, Daniel Gross wrote: > > Hi all, > > I recently stumbled (again) over some articles on the symbolic grounding > problem. I got curious, how does OpenCog deal with symbolic grounding, in > particular, of the autonomous kind ... > > thank you, > > Daniel > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/296ccdf5-4810-4d95-b2c6-6011f90dd830%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
