On 03/28/2017 07:13 PM, Vishnu Priya wrote:
1. If the input which is give, is R2L form of the sentences but does not
contain any variable,
Still can i apply the rules on them to get inferences?
because here the conditional instantiation-meta-rule is in the following
form and involves substitution of variables
with meaningful atoms.
;; ImplicationScopeLink
;; V
;; P
;; Q
;; |-
;; T
;; P
;; |-
;; Q[V->T]
What if i want to get inferences out of Criminal.scm automatically,
which is in the form of R2L and without hard-coding variables? i.e.
(KB without variables)
Ah, so you want for instance to either tell the system
"What croaks and eats flies is a frog"
or have it learn it from experience and such, instead of hard coding it
in the KB, right?
You're right, hard-coding everything is not practical. These examples
are more like toy tests than real world examples. The plan is to have
most of these learned or extracted from the web, or such. We'll still
hard code some stuff, things that are fundamental and hard to learn like
mathematics, amongst other things.
I'm not extremely familiar with the NLP code, but I think it can already
produce such knowledge (probably as implication links without variables,
but as explained here
http://wiki.opencog.org/w/ImplicationScopeLink#PLN_Semantics these are
equivalent to implication scopes).
Nil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/ee537d65-9b4d-70ef-211f-66b5887f84f7%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
