On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 AM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog < [email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not extremely familiar with the NLP code, but I think it can already > produce such knowledge (probably as implication links without variables, > but as explained here http://wiki.opencog.org/w/Impl > icationScopeLink#PLN_Semantics these are equivalent to implication > scopes). > Well, we do have some code in the opencog.nlp/relex2logic directory (aka R2L) that will convert the English-language sentence "Frogs eat flies" into a format that PLN can operate on. The R2L code does have some fundamental design flaws: the rules are hand-coded, there are about 60 or so of them, and we really need twice as many, but even if we had more, they most they can deal with is relatively unambiguous factual English sentences. What we really need is a way to automatically learn such rules. But if you just want to do some basic reasoning with simple English sentences, then R2L+PLN should be a fair way to do it. --linas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CAHrUA365P4hqCv7RbHh_%2B%3DyX%3DrKj1XXPKq%3DZRFV-WJJeYLVQkQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
