On 02/18/2018 11:22 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:53 PM, 'Nil Geisweiller' via opencog
I'm not sure I understand, could you elaborate? I can think of TimeLink,
HypotheticalLink, ContextLink and such, is that what you have in mind?
Well, we do not have a wiki page that explains "here's how you do versioning"
But we do have the ability to create chains of arbitrary depth:
OrderedLink
Concept "Commit 43"
SomeAtom
OrderedLink
Concept "Commit 42"
OtherAtom
OrderedLink
Concept "Commit 41"
MoreAtom
OrderedLink
....
Concept "root of chain"
> [...]
So in principle, the atomspace has all the basic ingredients needed to
support a blockchain. In practice, you'd have to write the wiki pages,
create some RFP process, create a bunch of tooling, get worried
about performance, usability, etc.
OK, get it, so it seems it would work except for truth values and
generally all valuations. I suppose a way around that would be to insert
valuations in the atomspace (turn protoatoms into atoms).
Nil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/06f89f75-8058-8513-4db2-342c8e19778c%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
